Thursday, 25 October 2018

What are the most unknown facts on the Second World War

Nazi Germany helped China ultimately prevail against the invading Japanese.
Yes that does sound strange because Germany and Japan were part of the Axis. Let me explain.
Germany and China cooperated politically and economically between 1926 until 1941. In the 1920s Germany and China were in absolute shambles. Germany had a crippled economy due to repercussions from World War 1. China a couple years prior had brought an end to the Qing dynasty and the fledging Kuomintang struggled to maintain control. Large areas were ruled by warlord factions and the looming Imperial Japan threat grew by the day. Poverty was rife in both countries.
Chinese propaganda celebrating the cooperation
The Treaty of Versailles heavily limited Germany’s industrial output especially in the weapons industry. China did not sign the Treaty of Versailles so Germany was technically allowed to legally export manufactured weapons to China. While there was cooperation in the 1920s, it was heavily ramped up following the Nazi party taking power in 1933. The Kuomintang desperately needed to modernize its army against the threats of Japan and the rising Communist party. Germany needed resources for rearmament. In 1934 a treaty was signed between the two nations where China would send raw materials in exchange for German industrial products and developments.
China’s railway rapidly improved and expanded under the cooperation. The Three Year Plan was created by the Kuomintang for China to build up industrially in order to resist Japan. Many steel factories, power plants, and chemical plants were constructed under this. Mostly importantly, China’s military strength vastly improved under this cooperation. German General von Falkenhausen trained around 8 Chinese divisions of around 80,000 soldiers. These soldiers were among the elite troops of the Nationalist forces, on par in skill and equipment as the German Wehrmacht. In addition the Nationalist army was supplied with German weaponry like Mauser K98 rifles, MG-34 machine guns, Krupp artillery, Pak anti-tank guns, and Panzer tanks.
Picture of the Chinese army. Note their helmets are the same as the German ones.
The elite German trained forces of the Chinese army
Following the start of the Second Sino Japanese War in 1937 between China and Japan, cooperation died down. However numerous German businesses were still in China including some that oversaw factories. The cooperation officially ended in 1941 when the Tripartite Pact was formed between Germany, Italy and Japan. In that same year China joined the Allied powers.
While the cooperation was short, the impact was absolutely instrumental in China’s efforts against the Japanese. The Imperial Japanese Army originally had the plan to conquer Shanghai in 3 days and China in 3 months. Instead the Battle of Shanghai turned out to be one fiercest engagements in all of World War 2. The battle is often regarded as the Stalingrad of the East. What was meant to be a roll over instead turned into three months of bloody fighting with the Chinese Nationalist forces inflicting unexpectedly high casualties among the invading Japanese army. This was largely due to Chiang Kai Shek stationing his elite German trained divisions there and they held up the Japanese forces for quite a bit before Japan ramped up the invasion with aerial, naval, and armored onslaught.
The 88th Division, one of the 8 German trained divisions, at the Battle of Shanghai
Despite ultimately losing Shanghai, China was able to launch counteroffensives in 1939 and 1945 to retake lost territories. Ultimately China was able to hold off the Japanese until 1941 when the United States joined World War 2. This meant Japan had to deal with a two front war and China started receiving aid and weaponry from the United States. The Chinese were also capable of keeping up the fight until 1945 when Japan officially surrendered and all territories previously annexed by Japan were returned to China. The Chinese German cooperation had a profound effect on the modernization of China and was invaluable in boosting China’s capability to resist Japan in World War 2. Had this cooperation never existed, China might very well have been completely subjugated by Japan. This meant significantly more casualties for the Chinese as well as Japan invading the Soviet Union. While it is up to debate as to whether the Axis would have won World War 2 had the Soviet Union been engaged in a two front war, it most definitely would have made Germany and Japan much, much tougher to defeat.
Additional note: Remember how in between 1939 to 1942 the German army was regarded as unstoppable because of blitzkrieg? Want to know how they built such a formidable army of mechanized infantry and arsenal of airplanes? You guessed it, through the resources China gave them.

Who are some historical figures wrongly portrayed in popular culture

Emperor Akbar and Queen Jodhaa Bai
Those who watch Bollywood movies would never forget the romantic portrayal of Emperor Akbar by Hrithik Roshan in the movie ‘Jodhaa Akbar’ in 2008. The movie portrays Emperor Akbar as a soft romantic and loving husband to his pretty Hindu Rajput wife, Jodhaa Bai, who he wins over with patience and love.
Truth be told, the movie had messed up the facts like anything. Here’s an article from Times of India that talks about this character…
Who was Jodha Bai? Indeed, if she existed at all, it was as Akbar's daughter-in-law (she was married to Jahangir) and not his wife! But, if you go by folktales and K Asif's classic Mughal-e-Azam, she was Amber ruler Raja Bharmal's daughter and Akbar's wife.
Here is what some of the country's top historians have to say: Asserts renowned historian and former chairman of Indian Council of Historical Research, Prof Irfan Habib, There was not any historical character called Jodha Bai.
It’s true that Akbar married Amber ruler Raja Bharmal's eldest daughter but her name is not mentioned anywhere. And she was certainly not Jahangir's mother. Even Jahangir in his memoirs (Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri) does not mention anything about his mother’s side.
Former president of Indian History Congress and chairman of the history department, Aligarh University, Prof Iqtedar Alam Khan corroborates Habib's version: It is only a Punjab historian Sujan Rai Bhandari, who in his book Khulasat-ut-Tawarikh mentions for the first time that the Amber princess whom Akbar married was Jahangir's mother.
But even Rai does not refer to her as Jodha Bai. However, there is another twist in the tale.
Medieval India, an NCERT history textbook for Class XI by Satish Chandra, clearly states on page 165: To strengthen his position, Udai Singh married his daughter, Jagat Gosain or Jodha Bai as she came to be called, to Akbar's eldest son Salim (Jahangir).
N R Farooqi, HoD of Allahabad University History department, confirms this when he says, Jodha was not Akbar's wife but Jahangir's and she was Shahjahan's mother. Bagh-e-Jahan Ara, an 80-acre garden in Agra, used to house her mausoleum till it was sold for Rs 5,000 by the British and subsequently razed to the ground.
Akbar married 15 (?) times. There is a mention of him marrying two Rajput princesses but neither of their names has been mentioned as Jodha Bai anywhere. The woman who gave birth to the eldest surviving son of Akbar, Prince Salim (later Emperor Jahangir) was given the title of Mariam-uz-Zamani, which means ‘Mary of the Age’… probably an honorary title bestowed upon her equating her to the more famous Mary who gave birth to Jesus Christ. And there are some historians who claim that the mother of Jahangir was just one of the concubines in Akbar’s harem.
Anyhow, one thing is clear. Although the movie portrayed Hrithik Roshan and Aishwarya Rai sharing a beautiful relationship as man and wife, even giving the impression that she was his only wife due to the obvious absence of any mention of any other wives, the truth was something different.
The Wikipedia page on Akbar has elaborately listed out all his marriages/alliances.
  1. Akbar's first wife and chief consort was his cousin, Princess Ruqaiya Sultan Begum,[27][4] the only daughter of his paternal uncle, Prince Hindal Mirza,[172] and his wife Sultanam Begum. In 1551, Hindal Mirza died fighting valorously in a battle against Kamran Mirza's forces. Upon hearing the news of his brother's death, Humayun was overwhelmed with grief.[23] Out of affection to the memory of his brother, Humayun betrothed Hindal's nine-year-old daughter Ruqaiya to his son Akbar. Their betrothal took place in Kabul, shortly after Akbar's first appointment as a viceroy in the province of Ghazni.[24] Humayun conferred on the imperial couple, all the wealth, army, and adherents of Hindal and Ghazni which one of Hindal's jagir was given to his nephew, Akbar, who was appointed as its viceroy and was also given the command of his uncle's army.[25] Akbar's marriage with Ruqaiya was solemnized near Jalandhar, Punjab, when both of them were 14-years-old.[26]Childless herself, she adopted Akbar's favorite grandson, Prince Khurram (the future emperor Shah Jahan). She died on 19 January 1626.[173]
  2. His second wife was the daughter of Abdullah Khan Mughal.[174]The marriage took place in 1557 during the siege of MankotBairam Khan did not approve of this marriage, for Abdullah's sister was married to Akbar's uncle, Prince Kamran Mirza, and so he regarded Abdullah as a partizan of Kamran. He opposed the match until Nasir-al-mulk made him understand that opposition in such matters was unacceptable. Nasir-al-mulk arranged an assemblage of pleasure and banquet of joy, and a royal feast was provided.[175]
  3. His third wife was his cousin, Salima Sultan Begum,[174] the daughter of Nur-ud-din Muhammad Mirza and his wife Gulrukh Begum also known as Gulrang, the daughter of Emperor Babur. She was at first betrothed to Bairam Khan by Humayun. After Bairam Khan's death in 1561, Akbar married her himself the same year. She died childless on 2 January 1613.[176]
  4. In 1562, he married the daughter of Raja Bihari Mal, ruler of Amer. The marriage took place when Akbar was on his way back from Ajmer after offering prayers to the tomb of Moinuddin Chishti. Bihari Mal had conveyed to Akbar that he was being harassed by his brother-in-law Sharif-ud-din Mirza (the Mughal hakim of Mewat). Akbar insisted that Bihari Mal should submit to him personally, it was also suggested that his daughter should be married to him as a sign of complete submission.[177]She was entitled Mariam-uz-Zamani after giving birth to Akbar's eldest surviving son, Prince Salim (the future emperor Jahangir). She died on 19 May 1623.[178]
  5. The same year, Akbar married the former wife of Abdul Wasi, the son of Shaikh Bada, lord of Agra. Akbar had fallen in love with her, and ordered Abdul Wasi to divorced her.[179]
  6. Another of his wives was Gauhar-un-Nissa Begum, the daughter of Shaikh Muhammad Bakhtiyar and the sister of Shaikh Jamal Bakhtiyar. Their dynasty was called Din Laqab and had been living for a long time in Chandwar and Jalesar near Agra. She was Akbar's chief wife.[180]
  7. His next marriage took place in 1564 to the daughter of Miran Mubarak Shah, the ruler of Khandesh. In 1564, he sent presents to the court with a request that his daughter be married by Akbar. Miran's request was acceded and an order was issued. Itimad Khan was sent with Miran's ambassadors, and when he came near the fort of Asir, which was Miran's residence. Miran welcomed Itimad with honor and dispatched his daughter with Itimad. A large number of nobles accompanied her. The marriage took place in September 1564 when she reached Akbar's court.[181] As dowry, Mubarak Shah ceded Bijagarh and Handia to his imperial son-in-law.[182]
  8. He married another Rajput princess in 1570, who was the daughter of Kahan, the brother of Rai Kalyan Mal Rai, the ruler of Bikanir. The marriage took place in 1570, when Akbar came to this part of the country. Kalyan made a homage to Akbar, and requested that his brother's daughter be married by him. Akbar accepted his proposal, and the marriage was arranged.
  9. He also married the daughter of Rawal Har Rai, the ruler of Jaisalmer in 1570.[183] Rawal had sent a request that his daughter be married by Akbar. The proposal was accepted by Akbar. Raja Bahgwan Das was despatched on this service. The marriage ceremony took place after Akbar's return from Nagor.[184] She was the mother of Princess Mahi Begum, who died on 8 April 1577.[185]
  10. Another of his wives was Bhakkari Begum, the daughter of Sultan Mahmud of Bhakkar.[186] On 2 July 1572, Akbar's envoy I'timad Khan reached Mahmud's court to escort his daughter to Akbar. I'timad Khan brought with him for Sultan Mahmud an elegant dress of honour, a bejewelled scimitar-belt, a horse with a saddle and reins and four elephants. Mahmud celebrated the occasion by holding extravagant feasts for fifteen days. On the day of wedding, the festivities reached their zenith and the ulema, saints and nobles were adequately honoured with rewards. Mahmud offered 30,000 rupees in cash and kind to I'timad Khan and farewelled his daughter with a grand dowry and an impressive entourage.[187] She came to Ajmer and waited upon Akbar. The gifts of Sultan Mahmud, carried by the delegation were presented to the ladies of the imperial harem.[188]
  11. His ninth wife was Qasima Banu Begum,[174] the daughter of Arab Shah. The marriage took place in 1575. A great feast was given, and the high officers, and other pillars of the state were present.[189]
  12. In 1577, the Rajah of Dungarpur State petitioned a request that his daughter might be married to Akbar. Akbar had regard to his loyalty and granted his request.[190] Rai Loukaran and Rajah Birbar, servants of the Rajah were sent from Dihalpur to do the honour of conveying his daughter. The two delivered the lady at Akbar's court where the marriage took place on 12 July 1577.[191]
  13. His eleventh wife was Bibi Daulat Shad.[174] She was the mother of Princess Shakr-un-Nissa Begum, and Princess Aram Banu Begum[192] born on 2 January 1585.[193]
  14. His next wife was the daughter of Shams Chak, a Kashmiri. The marriage took place on 3 November 1592. Shams belonged to the great men of the country, and had long cherished this wish.[194]
  15. In 1593, he married the daughter of Qazi Isa, and the cousin of Najib Khan. Najib told Akbar that his uncle had made his daughter a present for him. Akbar accepted his representation and on 3 July 1593 he visited Najib Khan's house and married Qazi Isa's daughter.[195]
So the Wikipedia page has also gotten the numbers messed up. He married 15 times (probably more!) and a majority of the alliances were political. He also boasted of an enormous harem teeming with women from kingdoms that he had annexed. None of this is even mentioned in any movie in which he features as a prime character.
And Queen Jodha Bai is probably the biggest question mark ever. Did she even exist? Even if she did, was she really like the character portrayed by Aishwarya Rai who sweeps Emperor Akbar off his feet with her charm and beauty, making him fall head over heels in love with her?
I don’t know. I wish it were true… but I have my reservations.

Is it true that Hitler is still respected in certain countries in the world? A German girl told me that when she first arrived to volunteer in Africa, people asked her if she knew Hitler, and some families had portraits of Hitler in their homes.

Hitler should be respected in all countries of the world, though loved in none. It honestly doesn't surprise me that Adolf Hitler would be, though, in many parts of the world today. Here's why.
Respect is not necessarily a quality of someone you would want to emulate. Respect is a simple acknowledgment of greatness, and greatness does not mean goodness. Respect is an understanding of someone who achieved something awesome and in Hitler's case he achieved something awesomely terrifying and terrible. He should be respected in the way that we never let his story die, every bit of it, so that future generations don't create another one like him.
What Hitler did was rise from complete failure to become the most powerful man in the world. He once lived on street benches. He was rejected from his college of choice and lived for years as a vagrant. He found his own way and made powerful friends. With his new friends he led many people to do great things. He correctly diagnosed many problems of his nation, or at least found things to blame. He brought together millions of people into one vision.
He built a powerful party that infiltrated all aspects of government. He gained so much influence that he became Germany's most powerful person all without winning a single election.
In a mere decade he led a regime that rebuilt its economy and its military strength after a crushing defeat.
If that had been the end of it, or if that was all there was to tell, he would be one of the most respected and revered people to have ever lived. That isn't, however, the whole story. His regime only became great through the use of intimidation, bribery and murder to suppress its political rivals. They became a world power again only because they employed genocide and human slavery to power their war machine.
In that same decade, however, he set in motion a chain of events that would suffer the world the deaths of over 9,000,000 of his fellow Germans, 28,000,000 Russians, 6,000,000 Jews, and at least 3,000,000 others from all around the world who rose to stop him. His regime built the most successful systematic force to enslave and exterminate millions of people the world has ever known. Germany under Hitler shattered Europe and threw the western world into a war that would change the balance of power for a century to come. He was without a doubt one of the most important people of not just the 20th century, but of all time.
I am willing to bet this may be the picture hanging up that your friend saw in Africa. At face value, it shows a proud man at the height of his power. It shows a man who rose from literally nothing to one of the most recognized names in history. It shows a powerful and charismatic leader. It shows a man who led a nation to believe in themselves enough to rebuild and thrive. I could see anyone wanting to emulate Adolf Hitler if that were all there was to know. What it doesn't show are the fundamental failures of his character. What it doesn't show is that he gained power by channeling hate and fear in his own people. What it doesn't show is that he made evil something that was the rational thing to do. What it doesn't show is a person so charismatic that he could lead millions to unimaginable barbarism without remorse. Finally, what it doesn't show is how one man can be all these things and yet lead his people to such unforgivable sins that their descendants are forced to carry with them for generations to come. What it also doesn't show is how easily his story could be repeated if respect for his true story isn't given. Certainly not respect for the man himself, but respect of the terrible power he eventually commanded. Respect enough that you learn everything there is to know about him, so that we never see another one. For this there must be open knowledge. For this there must be free education and those who are willing to teach the whole story. Most of all, there must be access to this universally to all people everywhere.
As I said before, Hitler should not be loved, honored or revered. Still in many places he probably is. He should, however, be respected. That is to say, not Hitler himself, but that the name Adolf Hitler is a name that should be respected in the way that we never forget what one man can become both in greatness or in the evil he inspires in others.
A question keeps being brought up in the comments that I feel deserves an answer. You don't have to read this to understand the answer, but if you don't understand why I would use the word "respect" it might help you greatly see the full scope of what it is I am trying to convey.
I think just remembering him and his cruel deeds would be fine. Why respect him?
Where I grew up there was a saying I remember that might answer your question. When I was very young I wandered upon a snake. It was a rattlesnake which in my region carries a very lethal venom. I think if this were India a cobra would be a good analog, though even more deadly. My uncle saw that I was curious and stood and stared at this thing in the bushes. He heard the sinister rattle and quickly pulled me away. He taught me then what a rattlesnake was and why I should fear it enough to give it its space rather than think myself in any way superior to it. The word he used was respect. In the Marines the word was used again, this time with the rifles we were trained with. At 18 and in bootcamp, many of us had never fired a real gun before. Some were ignorant of how to handle it. Some foolish and brazen. Some were afraid. Our instructors made a quick lesson to us to know that we shouldn't be afraid of the weapon, but we should respect it. We needed to understand its power and the damage it could do to our enemy if we master it or to ourselves if we were stupid. In both occasions we weren't asked to show the snake or the weapon "admiration", or "reverence", but something more akin to acknowledgment of the power they held and that we took due measures in how we treat them.
Johnmark Glaze found the best definition I think that captures my choice of meaning.
"proper acceptance or courtesy; acknowledgment:"
Respect is often a word that in reality does not mean revere or admire. Sometimes it can mean fear. It is only by the context it is used in that we know what its meaning truly is. My intention in this answer was to elicit the fear in others that I should have given to the snake. I was ignorant then. I thought it was just some oddity. It was just some evil thing and because I was good I could not be harmed. I was big and it was small. I was a thinking thing and it was just a stupid, crazy little snake that hid in the bushes. I was ignorant to its danger. I feel that our understanding of Adolf Hitler is the same sort of ignorance. We have made him into something simple, (evil and crazy) as well as his Nazi party. By doing this we have disassociated ourselves with the real danger that they represent. The Germans weren't an evil people. They couldn't all be crazy. Most would agree that Hitler himself wasn't crazy either. What he accomplished would be unfathomable for someone like Charles Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer. The danger of Hitler was that he gave the people a rational solution to their problems. Everything made sense if you just suspend your humanity long enough to see it. But with all said and done the German people will never be able to disassociate themselves from that terrible time when they were struck by the serpent's venom.
My true fear is that because people have simplified Hitler so much, they have ignored the very real danger that exists that he could happen again. Anywhere where there are people who are economically and culturally depressed there can be a leader who rises out of the bushes to inspire them. Anywhere they can become a great people if motivated by a single vision. This vision could one of goodness or they could be being led by someone evil. Mankind has also shown a unique ability to forget the fundamental difference between right and wrong when presented with the temporary euphoria brought about by prosperity. The true problem is that evil is fundamentally more powerful than good if the good do not stand together to fight it. As I said before, Hitler's regime was able to use intimidation, bribery and murder to suppress its political rivals. It used genocide and human slavery to power its war machine. These are powers the good do not have. But the ugly truth is that the same story could happen anywhere in the world even today if no one really knows what the signs are, to carry on the analogy, they don't know to recognize and respect the sound of rattling for what it means.
Now in the comments below I have been called everything from a person who admires Hitler, to a Nazi-sympathizer to a flat out Neo-Nazi, (to all of which I take great offense), simply for my use of the word respect. You may disagree with the word choice, but that may simply boil down to a difference in culture. So while I will respect these differing views, I hope that the fundamental message is not lost. I want people to respect Hitler in the way we should respect a snake. With fear and with knowledge. We understand its danger and therefore learn all we can about it. We know where to expect danger, but we do not give it the ability to strike at us. To do this we must be able to know how to recognize it and treat it the way it deserves, which where I grew up, usually involved the tip of very sharp shovel.

Why does the US want a trade war with China

China's currency (Yuan) manipulation
Let me explain, why China manipulates its currency?
China has the mammoth comparative advantage when its come to export orientation. Its cheap labour and comparatively low cost of production work as a great propeller for occupying the market across the world. USA is always the most preferable destination for China to export.
Why ?
Because, USA is the biggest consumer !
Thus, devalued its currency may be resulted to short-term loss for China, but long term gain for China. Because, China has all the necessary measures to attract the biggest consuming nation by supplying products in less cost.
The first and foremost target for China is to seize the market across the world. So, devalued its currency is never a loss for China but a trick to occupy the market.
According to allegation of Trump, China intentionally devalued its currency.. By doing so, China primarily get acceptance to the consumer of USA and Europe. Because, the same product varied in terms of price tags. As a results, the consumer of USA or Europe easily get motivated to swallow the products from China, because its less costly to avail. In this manner, the domestic products and company of USA face a kind of doomsday in their run.
The most shocking issue for the USA's president Donald Trump is the consumer motivation or tilt towards Chinese products.
As a result, there is a conspicuous trade surplus of China to USA. And this ushered in such a way that the whole of USA's economy facing a stiff challenge.
Trade deficit
According to very recent data from different sources, the current trade deficit of USA with China is a mammoth staggering amount of 370+ billion $.
Here, USA's export to China is a staggering amount of 165+ billion $ and China's export to USA is almost 506 billion $ .
See, the advantage of China in bilateral trade with USA. Its absolutely thundering and threatening to USA economy.
Dooming USA manufacturing ( both big+small) industry
As China hold an unshakable stands in trade with USA, the manufacturing industry of USA is gradually demising. The reason is same.
China firstly buy some raw industrial material from USA . Secondly , China modify and remanufacture these materials. Then, it sells all modified and remanufactured products to USA in a less costly manner. In this run, the USA's face a kind gradual demise because they can't supply the same products with similar price tags like China.
USA's production company's always lag behind in this case. Because , they have no cheap labor and cheap production cost like China. So it's fail to supply all these products in a parallel price tag like china
Thus , USA become gradually marred to Chinese production and company.
Employment
Employment is another concern for USA. Though , of late the graph of overall employment scenario is increasing compared to previous administrations. But the real concern lies with the China's production. If this going on, then anytime in future USA company will be forced to cut off their employees number, because they will be unable to hold it anymore. Its all about loss and so the result.
So, it goes without saying this will affect USA's employment scenario.
So what option left behind for USA ?
Its simple….
Impose tariffs over and over again on Chinese goods for reducing trade surplus and so on.
The Trump administrations have left only this option to battle with China in trade.
That's it…

What are some of the costliest mistakes ever made in history

The Great Leap Forward was a plan to restructure China’s economy, and develop the nation.
One of the very first steps, was called the Four Pests campaign.
It was a plan to eradicate mosquitos, flies, rats, and sparrows.
The first ones make sense, but why sparrows?
Apparently sparrows ate “too much fruit and grain,” and therefore needed to be exterminated.
-
It didn’t make a whole lot of sense, but the campaign went through. The citizens of China were all encouraged to kill as many sparrows as they could.
-
To do this, they all got drums, pots, pans, or anything else that made a loud noise, and would use them to make a racket where the sparrows lived. Too scared to land, the sparrows would fly around until they dropped out of the sky from exhaustion.
They would also destroy bird nests, smash their eggs, and even just shoot them out of the sky. There would be rewards for whoever could shoot the most sparrows in a day.
-
The campaign was enormously successful. They drove the sparrows perilously close to extinction. Now those pesky birds wouldn’t eat the grain or fruit. Success!
Or maybe not.

As the Chinese soon found out, sparrows eat a lot of locusts. They are virtually their only predator. With all the sparrows gone, nothing was keeping the locusts in check. So what happened to the locust population?
It exploded. It got insanely, obscenely, ridiculously massive.
-
And what do locusts eat?
Grains, fruit, plants, and basically anything remotely edible.
-
Massive locust swarms moved across China and destroyed any and all food they came upon. There were so many, the swarms would routinely block out the sun. For years, the locusts destroyed huge amounts of food.

This caused the largest famine in human history. Over 30 million people starved to death. It was one of the biggest humanitarian disasters of the 20th century.
And all because the Chinese government decided to kill this guy.
That, is the costliest mistake in history.

Friday, 19 October 2018

Which nation is most in need of a new flag

Turkmenistan.
The reason Turkmenistan needs a new flag is because their current one is too complex and difficult to reproduce.
You see, Turkmenistan is a country known for its ornate rugs and carpets.
So after becoming independent from the USSR, the new Turkmen Government thought it would make good national pride to include five traditional carpet styles onto their flag.
The problem was that putting 5 different carpet styles in a bar made the flag difficult to recreate in mass production.
So if most people in Turkmenistan want to look patriotic, they are likely to put up a portrait of their leader,
In a building,
In monuments,
In races,
Or Parades.


So yeah, if Turkmenistan wants to look less authoritarian, it would be best to have a simpler flag.